Three Things… #5: The Mashup

Reading, Watching, Doing

This is a place for me to hold forth on matters both serious and silly. You are invited to participate. 

Forgive me readers, it has been 6 years, 2 months and 6 days since I last three-thinged. Disgraceful, is it not? For my sins I must say half a dozen ‘Hail Atwoods’ and abstain from eating chocolate cake until at least Sunday teatime. And it jolly well serves me right!

I’m not going to attempt to summarise everything I’ve read, watched and done since 2018, though I will on this occasion include a snapshot of a Moomin table lamp decoration from our wedding bash last September. Fond memories and all that. Thenceforth, this feature has been officially rebooted with minor changes and will peer no further into the past than 1st January 2025.

One final point before I get started: Much as I relish a lovely long list under a bold heading, I’m mostly going to adopt the mix and mingle method from here on in. It makes sense as practically every topic I cover would fit perfectly well into all three categories. Righty-ho! Let’s get this chicken airborne. 

Reading, Watching, Doing: An Amalgamation 

As ever, I’ve been reading all manner of books, essays, articles and short stories. Some merit a mention, others most definitely don’t.

On my nightstand I typically like to keep a slow book simmering, which I then dip-into nonchronologically over an indefinite period. In other words, I take a readerly meander each night before dozing off with specs still perched on my nose. At present, I am randomly perusing No Modernism Without Lesbians by Diana Souhami (she of Gertrude and Alice, Wild Girls: Natalie Barney and Romaine Brooks and various other biographies of prominent lesbians), an engaging history of “four women [living in Paris between the wars] who broke the rules,” and “fostered the birth of the Modernist movement.” More on this in future TTs.

While on link truffling duties for Winding Up the Week, I often disappear down a rabbit hole only to emerge in a badger’s set (or a puffin’s burrow) – that is to say, not at all where I expected to be but, nonetheless, a welcome diversion. It is on such forays I’ve blundered into features such as these which, while sometimes unsuitable (for any number of reasons) for my Saturday digest, are worth touching on because I find them funny, fascinating, poignant, pertinent, quite possibly infuriating, or a chaotic combination of all five.

Just a small taste this time but, for instance, there’s Agnes Callard’s article, Where the Wild Things Aren’t in issue #9 of Asterisk wherein, she discusses telling “our children that weirdness is a blessing in disguise.” This, she feels, is “our fantasy, not theirs.” She riffs on how “heavily didactic and moralistic” children’s literature of the past holds little or no interest for kids today (they “would not know what to make of it”). Nowadays novels lean towards “odd and exceptional and moody and alienated children” whose protagonists have a tendency, as she puts it, to being “nonconformist, disobedient to authority figures, a misfit or loner who lives in a world of their own.” While the young were once encouraged to be virtuous (or at the very least “ordinary”), they are now “invited to be weird.” Are we “finding ever more fine-grained ways to squash” people rather than liberate them? “Given the collapse of individualism,” she observes, “why celebrate weirdness?” A very good question!

A Moomin table lamp at our wedding

Now for Neil Gaiman… What a very sad state of affairs it is when one of our most celebrated living fantasy authors is accused by eight separate women of non-consensual sexual acts and coercion. He has denied this, of course, but we have reached a stage where he and his ex-wife, Amanda Palmer are being sued for rape and human trafficking. So, once again, we are compelled to ask ourselves if it is wise ever to raise ‘inspirational’ people aloft as models of behaviour and morality (be they literary idols or otherwise). If you originally wanted to read this lengthy Vulture exposé but were prevented from doing so by the paywall, here is an archival copy of the article. I will, however, caution you that personally I found it deeply depressing, frequently distressing and not a little stomach-churning. Nevertheless, I will leave you with a link to Lila Shapiro’s There Is No Safe Word: How the best-selling fantasy author Neil Gaiman hid the darkest parts of himself for decades. You can make up your own minds.

A new day dawns over the Marina

I’ve no desire to end on a low, so I will tell you what fun Mrs Jotter and I had attending one of The North Wales Burlesque and Cabaret Festival shows last month, celebrating the troupe’s tenth anniversary. It was the perfect way to lift us out of our post festive doldrums, featuring as it did performers with names like Lili Del Fflur, Foxee Stole and Carnal Rot. It was a bit naughty in a Carry On film sort of way, but ideally mood enhancing on a wet and windy evening.

I should also like to share with you my discovery of a delicious veggie version of stir fry crispy ‘duck’, which I’ve become partial to this winter. When we (not infrequently) nip to our ‘local’ for a bite to eat and a cold-weather snifter-lifter, I often order the ‘Hoi-Sin vegetarian ‘duck’ and stir-fried vegetables with basmati and wild rice. It’s heartening to find a tasty no-meat-or-fish alternative to the usual V-marked ‘pub grub’ items on the menu. Incidentally, it is also suitable for vegans. A definite win-win for both duck and diner.

Why not let me know what you’ve been doing with your days, or better still, compile your own Three Things-type post.



Categories: Three Things

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

28 replies

  1. “Why not let me know what you’ve been doing with your days, or better still, compile your own Three Things-type post.’ And I think i will. (Once I cleat the backlog. Or maybe i’ll just leapfrog the list. or maybe pick up another book instead. The Souhami looks interesting. I really enjoyed “Gluck”. But then there these other books. Oh dear. And i haven’t even read the The Book Jotter weekly yet! Time for a pre breakfast nap.

  2. Lovely to see Three Things… back, Paula – I’ve done these myself in the past and I might have to do a revisit as it’s a prompt I enjoyed! Very pleased to hear about the local veggie food alternatives, and I *love* the Moomins lamp!!

  3. Your intro paragraph was hilarious and witty, Paula. Thanks for the laughs 🙂

  4. The Souhami book sounds great – I find that period endlessly fascinating. The Moomin lamp is just lovely!

    • Thanks so much, Madame Bibi. Oh, me too. I’ve had the Souhami book for what must be two years but have only recently placed it on my bedside table. Glad you like the Moomin lamps. We bought about twenty of those things and adapted them (well, D did as she’s good at that sort of thing) so they lit up and stayed that way throughout the evening. ☺️

  5. Glad to see this feature back, Paula! The Gaiman case is truly disturbing–and human beings do sadly have this tendency to raising heroes/heroines to far too lofty heights. Perhaps if we simply appreciated their talents–then again, comes the question of talent in one field vis-a-vis moral turpitude otherwise–and this impacting how their talent is viewed/it’s acceptance as well.

  6. I loved the Agnes Callard essay – thanks so much for sharing! As a historian of childhood, there was a lot for me to reflect on here. I had a couple of thoughts that she gestures towards but doesn’t explicitly say. One is that adults often like to tell children how to be liberated without thinking about the realities of being a child. It’s lovely for us as adults to tell children ‘it’s great to be weird’, but if you have to go to school and fit in with your peers, it may not be so great. Children are smart and will read these books as fantasies if they don’t fit with their everyday experience.

    Two is that I sometimes feel like the category of ‘weirdness’ is disappearing because of the drive towards categorisation she talks about later in the essay – i.e. you can’t just be weird any more, especially if you’re a kid, you have to be neurodivergent, autistic, ADHD etc. This feels to me (as a formerly very weird kid) like it’s narrowing the range of the ‘normal’ sometimes rather than increasing it, although of course all power to those who do feel seen and understood by these categories.

    • Thanks so much for your thoughtful reply, Laura. I can certainly see where Callard is coming from – and I say that as someone who was an autistic child (though I wasn’t diagnosed until much later in life). It is one thing being on ‘the spectrum’, for instance, and learning to be happy with yourself, but quite another when kids are actively encouraged to label themselves and put themselves in ‘the different box’ because it is the fashionable thing to do. I agree with you completely, it does narrow their range and make them feel they’re missing out by simply being themselves. 🤷‍♀️

  7. This is all so interesting and funny and witty, thank you; a win win for duck and diner is a great line!

  8. Thank you for making me aware of Agnes Callard’s article Paula. I found that fascinating and will bear her comments in mind when I’m reviewing children’s fiction in future.

  9. I love this post! I will be reading the article about Neil Gaiman as I’m interested in this problem we currently have with authors who turn out to have a dark side that they’ve indulged. Also, the Diana Souhami looks really interesting. I’ve read her biography work before and really enjoyed it.

  10. Paula, I always enjoy your wit.

  11. Three things is a great read with a superb and intriguing ending, a vege duck dish win win! I hope you keep it going!

Trackbacks

  1. Winding Up the Week #412 – Book Jotter
  2. Three Things… #6 – Book Jotter
  3. Three Things… #7 – Book Jotter
  4. – Three Things + #8: A Summer Summation – Book Jotter
  5. Winding Up the Week #454 – Book Jotter

Leave a Reply to LitloveCancel reply

Discover more from Book Jotter

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading